<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [SOLVED] Dreamweaver: Site-wide, design time style sheets using templates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://james.revillini.com/2008/01/24/solved-dreamweaver-site-wide-design-time-style-sheets-using-templates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://james.revillini.com/2008/01/24/solved-dreamweaver-site-wide-design-time-style-sheets-using-templates/</link>
	<description>Say 'no' to styrofoam.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:07:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://james.revillini.com/2008/01/24/solved-dreamweaver-site-wide-design-time-style-sheets-using-templates/comment-page-1/#comment-19031</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.revillini.com/2008/01/24/solved-dreamweaver-site-wide-design-time-style-sheets-using-templates/#comment-19031</guid>
		<description>I believe this function IS built-in, at least as of DW CS3.  See DW
  
 Text--&gt;CSS Styles--&gt;Design Time...

The built-in function is simple, does only one file at a time, but there&#039;s a very inexpensive CMX extension that can do the job site-wide.

This solution uses auxiliary _notes files, which seems fragile to me, and requires a bit of maintenance.  I am not certain if it can help with embedded style-sheets.

 I prefer your solution because it is self-contained within the template -- which is one of the fundamental reasons for using a template, yes?

I&#039;m new to all this, and self-taught, but my software engineering experience suggests that there should be a standardized mechanism to make particular markup visible at specified &quot;times&quot;, e.g. design-time.

Your scheme would seem to depend on DW&#039;s processing of .html files into some kind of internal model as you load each such file to edit.   I&#039;ve yet to understand what is done -- details might not be available publicly-- and I&#039;d guess Adobe might change that processing at any time.  

Thinking out loud,one might write an extension that uncovers link tags  --or anything else-- that are put inside plain HTML comments, based on user-defined start- and end-strings.    That would give a bit more control to users, I think.   If I knew JavaScript....

Thanks,

Henry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe this function IS built-in, at least as of DW CS3.  See DW</p>
<p> Text&#8211;&gt;CSS Styles&#8211;&gt;Design Time&#8230;</p>
<p>The built-in function is simple, does only one file at a time, but there&#8217;s a very inexpensive CMX extension that can do the job site-wide.</p>
<p>This solution uses auxiliary _notes files, which seems fragile to me, and requires a bit of maintenance.  I am not certain if it can help with embedded style-sheets.</p>
<p> I prefer your solution because it is self-contained within the template &#8212; which is one of the fundamental reasons for using a template, yes?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m new to all this, and self-taught, but my software engineering experience suggests that there should be a standardized mechanism to make particular markup visible at specified &#8220;times&#8221;, e.g. design-time.</p>
<p>Your scheme would seem to depend on DW&#8217;s processing of .html files into some kind of internal model as you load each such file to edit.   I&#8217;ve yet to understand what is done &#8212; details might not be available publicly&#8211; and I&#8217;d guess Adobe might change that processing at any time.  </p>
<p>Thinking out loud,one might write an extension that uncovers link tags  &#8211;or anything else&#8211; that are put inside plain HTML comments, based on user-defined start- and end-strings.    That would give a bit more control to users, I think.   If I knew JavaScript&#8230;.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Henry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

